2010/4/14 Doriano Blengino <doriano.bleng...@fastwebnet.it>: > Errata corrige:
>> May be that I am missing something, but... how can you say that it works >> if it omits to test the last item? >> > Time later, driving to home and still thinking about this routine, I > finally recalled what you wanted to say with "comprobation". > Yes, you are right - your code works. If I would have payed more > attention to the routine, I would have noticed. But, stupidly, I > concentrated only on the cycle, noting that it was missing a test on the > last item. That last item is managed by the last test before exiting. > > Still I don't like this routine. What happens if TabStrip1.Count=0 > (emtpy tabstrip)? Ouch! TabStrip without tabs doesn't fit in my mind, ie Why somebody want a TabStrip without at least one tab? Moreover, by default TabStrip have one tab. (design time and execution time). > "Listen twice before you speak. > This is why we have two ears, but only one mouth." ha! Very funny. I like it. Regards. -- Fabián Flores Vadell www.speedbooksargentina.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
