In my opinion that is correct choice. Because if you remove DIV aka / operator there will be problem for those who used this in their programs in the past.
In the other hand if you add % operator as MOD the arithmetic operators will be complete and whole in my opinion as i read the manual. A last note if old developers like very much the strict classic Basic style you must weight their opinion if it is going to add or not a MOD operator, so not to be hard feelings. On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:31 +0100, Benoît Minisini wrote: > > Hi to all, and good morning. > > > > Dont worry you dont hurt me. :) > > > > I am not a C++ person not at all. > > > > Of course there is no need to turn Basic in C style. > > > > But i make a notice about DIV and MOD. > > The one of them has a synonmous as operator. > > > > The only thing i propose is to maintain a same "thinking" while reading > > the manual with programming style. > > > > To do this there are two options > > - MOD and DIV should not have operators > > - MOD and DIV it is nice to have operators. > > > > Or we leave the things as they are. > > > > All options are respectfull ones. > > > > I can add '%' to the compiler as a MOD synonymous, as I don't think I will > use > this character for anything else. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
