On 12.10.2011 19:05, John Spikowski wrote: > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 19:43 +0300, Jussi Lahtinen wrote: >> My first thought too... and I wonder why there is limit anyway..? >> I have understand that collection works with hash values, and at least there >> are no practical limitations with MD5 hash function. >> >> Jussi > For grins, I thought I would test the hash key length in ScriptBasic to > see if this was a common problem. I don't think there is a practical > limit to the key size in ScriptBasic. > > IMPORT hash.bas > > h = hash::New() > hash::SetValue(h,"A1234567890",1) > hash::SetValue(h,"B12345678901234567890",2) > hash::SetValue(h,"C123456789012345678901234567890",3) > hash::Start(h) > > FOR x = 1 to 3 > PRINT hash::ThisKey(h), " - " > PRINT hash::ThisValue(h),"\n" > hash::Next(h) > NEXT > > jrs@laptop:~/sb/test$ scriba testhash.sb > A1234567890 - 1 > B12345678901234567890 - 2 > C123456789012345678901234567890 - 3 > jrs@laptop:~/sb/test$
i tested the limitation, too, in gb3 but it ran o.k. how may the exceeding of the key length influence the program integrity? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
