Le 12/06/2012 16:30, jm a écrit : > > I take it that is a definite no then? :-) > > If I'm really under pressure, then I'm sure I can go > write a lite preprocessor as needed and manage. > > Any chance of exporting IDE's highlighted code as colorful HTML > for documentation purposes? > > Thank you, best regards. > >
Nothing is definite. But I want Gambas to offer the less possible syntactic sugar to the user (it's roughly the opposite of Python & Perl AFAIK). It makes program more readable and debugging is easier. I know that many Gambas programmer have the capacity to create code without tabulations and random variable names, but I can't do nothing against that - at the moment :-) So, to say things differently: preprocessing like the C/C++ preprocessor is far too powerful for my taste. I will reread your mails carefully (I didn't had the time to look the thread entirely yet), but I'm almost sure that you do not need a preprocessor at all. Regards, -- Benoît Minisini ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
