Hi Bryan, Its not a monster though. I don't know how much you have read science fiction etc, but as someone who has been reading science fiction since I could read the way you and others are treating the temporal disturbance as a living creature, a monster, rather than a thing drives me slightly up the wall for some reason. I certainly don't want to come off as uppity or arrogant here, but when people begin talking about a temporal disturbance like it was a monster rather than a time-space disturbance it makes them sound completely ignorant of basic science fiction which they probably are.
More to the point since the temporal disturbance is not a monster it can't be killed and I just feel people should use the correct verb which would be to destroy. To give you an example in Shades of Doom there is lots of equipment around in the rooms you can blow up, shoot, destroy. When you destroy a piece of equipment you would say you "destroyed it" not "killed it." Same principle applies to the temporal disturbance. Although, the way people use slang these days I'll admit that people often talk about killing computers and other things that aren't alive as well so the verb is probably acceptable to most people who aren't as literal as I am. Anyway, rant over. Sorry for the rant but it just was something I wanted to get off my chest. Cheers! On 4/7/14, Bryan Peterson <bpeterson2...@cableone.net> wrote: > It's considered a monster so I say kill. > > > > Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? --- Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org. You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org. All messages are archived and can be searched and read at http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list, please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.
