On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:05:13PM +0200, Guido Trotter wrote: > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 12:10:09PM +0200, Guido Trotter wrote: > >> > >> This document contains a skeleton for the 2.1 design process. > >> For now it just has introductory paragraphs and a structure for the > >> various areas' design, but some sections still don't have a text, as > >> we're still in the early design phases. > > > > So, I'm not sure about adding the glossary yet-again. Maybe we should split > > the > > glossary into a separate rst file which is then included in the main docs. > > > > Other than that, LGTM, can you please commit it on a new branch > > 'branch-2.1'? > > > > Sure. I was just thinking, should we call it master-2.1? This way we > have the "stable" master, and the various masters for future releases. > Will remove the glossary for now.
Since the 'master' branch is treated (or at least handled slightly) differently, I would say have a different name (just to be clear). master and master-2.1 are easy to confuse, master and branch-2.1 are harder. iustin
