On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since the 'master' branch is treated (or at least handled slightly) > differently, I would say have a different name (just to be clear). master and > master-2.1 are easy to confuse, master and branch-2.1 are harder. > Ok, perfect! Thanks, Guido
