On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:43:21PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Flavio Silvestrow >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > +""" >> > + >> > + >> > +from ganeti import errors >> >> we could do perhaps >> from ganeti import errors as ganeti_errors >> and >> from nbma import errors (see below) >> so we can define our own errors. > > *if* (and only if) these utils will always be installed together with ganeti, > it's acceptable to have a single errors module. > > if not, of course you'll need a completely separate set of errors. >
Currently we plan on depending on Ganeti (or at least parts of its libraries), so using parts of the codes/errors is fine. But I'd still like to make sure that the proper errors are used, rather than redefining the meaning of ganeti errors with a different purpose! Thanks, Guido
