On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:01:20PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:43:21PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Flavio Silvestrow > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > +""" > >> > + > >> > + > >> > +from ganeti import errors > >> > >> we could do perhaps > >> from ganeti import errors as ganeti_errors > >> and > >> from nbma import errors (see below) > >> so we can define our own errors. > > > > *if* (and only if) these utils will always be installed together with > > ganeti, > > it's acceptable to have a single errors module. > > > > if not, of course you'll need a completely separate set of errors. > > > > Currently we plan on depending on Ganeti (or at least parts of its > libraries), so using parts of the codes/errors is fine. > But I'd still like to make sure that the proper errors are used, > rather than redefining the meaning of ganeti errors with a different > purpose!
Agreed, indeed! iustin
