On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:49:34AM +0100, Olivier Tharan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The chroot and fake hypervisors were missing:
> >
> > - the powercycle node functionality
> > - proper handling of migration requests
> >
> > The powercycle was just used as in the other hypervisors (use the
> > standard linux powercycle). The migration for chroot was disabled
> > explicitly, whereas for the fake one it was implemented to simulate
> > correctly. This required some work on the fake hypervisor, but now the
> > implementation of start/stop/etc. is much more clean.
> > ---
> >  lib/hypervisor/hv_base.py   |    4 +-
> >  lib/hypervisor/hv_chroot.py |   20 +++++++++
> >  lib/hypervisor/hv_fake.py   |  100 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/hypervisor/hv_chroot.py b/lib/hypervisor/hv_chroot.py
> > index 69b9fe2..e30ddf1 100644
> > --- a/lib/hypervisor/hv_chroot.py
> > +++ b/lib/hypervisor/hv_chroot.py
> > @@ -255,3 +255,23 @@ class ChrootManager(hv_base.BaseHypervisor):
> >     """
> >     if not os.path.exists(self._ROOT_DIR):
> >       return "The required directory '%s' does not exist." % self._ROOT_DIR
> > +
> > + �...@classmethod
> > +  def PowercycleNode(cls):
> > +    """Chroot powercycle, just a wrapper over Linux powercycle.
> > +
> > +    """
> > +    cls.LinuxPowercycle()
> > +
> > +  def MigrateInstance(self, instance, target, live):
> > +    """Migrate an instance.
> > +
> > +   �...@type instance: L{object.Instance}
> > +   �...@param instance: the instance to be migrated
> > +   �...@type target: string
> > +   �...@param target: hostname (usually ip) of the target node
> > +   �...@type live: boolean
> > +   �...@param live: whether to do a live or non-live migration
> > +
> > +    """
> > +    raise HypervisorError("Migration not supported the chroot hypervisor")
> 
> "Not supported *by*" perhaps?
> 
> Otherwise LGTM

Thanks, fixed. I also fixed the commit subject, "Complete
implementation" can be misunderstood.

iustin

Reply via email to