2010/5/18 Guido Trotter <[email protected]>:
> Basically each job would have a subscribers list, and it would be the
> job of the thread which updates the job to also update the subscribers
> on the change (by queueing data to be sent to them, which will be done
> by asyncore in the main thread at its convenience).

I think there should be more separation between jobs (or mcpu/jqueue)
here. Jobs should just notify another thread which will take care of
all wait-for-changes requests (comparing previous to current
information, etc.). This way you don't delay the job with composing
replies to LUXI requests.

Michael

Reply via email to