On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Michael Hanselmann <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/5/18 Guido Trotter <[email protected]>: >> Basically each job would have a subscribers list, and it would be the >> job of the thread which updates the job to also update the subscribers >> on the change (by queueing data to be sent to them, which will be done >> by asyncore in the main thread at its convenience). > > I think there should be more separation between jobs (or mcpu/jqueue) > here. Jobs should just notify another thread which will take care of > all wait-for-changes requests (comparing previous to current > information, etc.). This way you don't delay the job with composing > replies to LUXI requests. >
Makes sense. I will add this to the design. Thanks, Guido
