On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 06:20:25PM +0200, Agata Murawska wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 06:43:55PM +0200, Agata Murawska wrote: > >> For storage_list call, the result type depends on the call parameters. > >> Therefore, we have to add call as an argument for rpcResultFill - and > >> by extension, to the typeclass. > > > > I see. So we don't have the RpcResult type class, since a RPC result is > > not standalone, but depends on the call. Damn, this is very ugly design > > (on the existing Python RPC side). > > > > LGTM for now, but I dislike moving into this direction. > > > > iustin > > Just FYI, forgot to change it in one place - I take that it's still fine ;)
NO NO NO ABORT! (Just joking, saw your commits already) iustin
