On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 06:43:44PM +0200, Agata Murawska wrote: >> This was repeated a lot, so we should abstract this into a type. > > LGTM; the ERPCError is a bit too sneaky though. Agreed, but I can't think of a nicer name - RpcErrorOrA? ;)
> > iustin
