On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:28:42AM +0200, Agata Murawska wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 06:43:44PM +0200, Agata Murawska wrote: > >> This was repeated a lot, so we should abstract this into a type. > > > > LGTM; the ERPCError is a bit too sneaky though. > Agreed, but I can't think of a nicer name - RpcErrorOrA? ;)
Me neither… what about forgetting the error part? 'Either RpcError' is a container for either an error or an actual result, so RpcResult? (Guess you already have that) RpcContainer? Anyway, leave it as such for now, we can clear it later. iustin
