On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:28:42AM +0200, Agata Murawska wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 06:43:44PM +0200, Agata Murawska wrote:
> >> This was repeated a lot, so we should abstract this into a type.
> >
> > LGTM; the ERPCError is a bit too sneaky though.
> Agreed, but I can't think of a nicer name - RpcErrorOrA? ;)

Me neither… what about forgetting the error part? 'Either RpcError' is a
container for either an error or an actual result, so RpcResult? (Guess
you already have that) RpcContainer?

Anyway, leave it as such for now, we can clear it later.

iustin

Reply via email to