On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 09:42:34AM +0200, Agata Murawska wrote:
> 2012/10/5 Iustin Pop <[email protected]>:
> > The String parameter to 'nodeLiveFieldExtract' is the query2 field
> > name, not the RPC-layer field name. Grrr for not having a real data
> > type for this.
> Huh, this is interesting - I had it with FieldName originally, but
> changed since the string values here were the same as names of the
> fields used for dictionary creation (see Rpc.hs) and I hoped this can
> then be at some point automated.

I think you are mistaken. The bug was exactly that you used the same
string, when the opcode-layer and RPC-layer strings are different.

> > Furthermore, we add some safety check that we don't return JSNull via
> > rsNormal…
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Iustin Pop <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  htools/Ganeti/Query/Node.hs |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/htools/Ganeti/Query/Node.hs b/htools/Ganeti/Query/Node.hs
> > index ded9979..0630754 100644
> > --- a/htools/Ganeti/Query/Node.hs
> > +++ b/htools/Ganeti/Query/Node.hs
> > @@ -72,29 +72,31 @@ nodeLiveFieldsDefs =
> >  -- the RPC result.
> >  nodeLiveFieldExtract :: String -> RpcResultNodeInfo -> J.JSValue
> I may have gaps in my memory (no code on this machine ;) ), but
> shouldn't the type be FieldName not String now?

Indeed, but type FieldName = String, so I didn't pay too much attention.
Consider it fixed.

thanks,
iustin

Reply via email to