On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 04:55:33PM +0000, Dato Simó wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:35 +0100, Iustin Pop <ius...@google.com> wrote: > > > (c) just use oLuxiSocket as-is (to allow for alternate Luxi socket > > > locations), but have the code in Harep.hs _default_ itself to using > > > Path.defaultLuxiSocket. > > > > In (c), `harep` without any options works, but -L can be pass to > > > specify an alternate location of the socket. > > > > Thoughts? > > > I was thinking of a new option that is similar to oLuxiSocket, just > > defaulting to the defaultLuxiSocket, i.e. (b). But I'm not sure why this > > would be more work, instead of oLuxiSocket it would simply be > > oLuxiSocketAlways or such. > > > However, (c) looks appealing, so let's go with that. > > Ok, the implementation of (c) looks like:
Sounds good. LGTM! iustin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ganeti-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ganeti-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
