2013/1/30 Bernardo Dal Seno <[email protected]>: > On 30 January 2013 13:12, Michael Hanselmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> Couldn't this function return the original value, so one can write >> code to restore it? > > It could, but I've found no actual use for that, so I'd prefer to keep > the function void like the other tests. It's easy to add this feature > if needed. Or have you found places where it should be used?
That means you have to hardcode the (default) setting in different places. If you could just restore the original most tests can set it to what they need and then restore. Michael
