On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Klaus Aehlig <[email protected]> wrote:
> With the change to luxid handling job queue requests, we
> also inherited the parsing semantics of luxid, i.e., a
> request is only considered syntactically correct, if all
> parts are. Document that we decided to consider this change
> of semantics desirable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Aehlig <[email protected]>
> ---
>  NEWS | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
> index 78ede67..090ed0a 100644
> --- a/NEWS
> +++ b/NEWS
> @@ -10,6 +10,15 @@ Version 2.11.0 alpha1
>  Incompatible/important changes
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> +Incompatible/important changes
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Isn't this doubling the "Incompatible/important changes" header?

> +
> +- Over luxi, syntactially incorrect queries are now rejected as a whole;
> +  before, a 'SumbmitManyJobs' request was partially executed, if the outer
> +  structure of the request was syntactically correct. As the luxi protocol
> +  is internal (external applications are expected to use RAPI), the impact
> +  of this incompatible change should be limited.
> +
>  New features
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> --
> 1.8.4.1
>

Thanks,
Michele
-- 
Google Germany GmbH
Dienerstr. 12
80331 München

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores

Reply via email to