On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Klaus Aehlig <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 01:40:05PM +0100, Michele Tartara wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Klaus Aehlig <[email protected]> wrote: >> > With the change to luxid handling job queue requests, we >> > also inherited the parsing semantics of luxid, i.e., a >> > request is only considered syntactically correct, if all >> > parts are. Document that we decided to consider this change >> > of semantics desirable. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Klaus Aehlig <[email protected]> >> > --- >> > NEWS | 9 +++++++++ >> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS >> > index 78ede67..090ed0a 100644 >> > --- a/NEWS >> > +++ b/NEWS >> > @@ -10,6 +10,15 @@ Version 2.11.0 alpha1 >> > Incompatible/important changes >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> > >> > +Incompatible/important changes >> > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> Isn't this doubling the "Incompatible/important changes" header? > > Indeed, it is. > > commit 03596e2e66696e92d5189f3a54b5a02a42c31848 > Author: Klaus Aehlig <[email protected]> > Date: Tue Nov 12 13:47:12 2013 +0100 > > Interdiff patch 4/4 Document incompatible change of luxi > > diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS > index 090ed0a..afe2cd7 100644 > --- a/NEWS > +++ b/NEWS > @@ -10,9 +10,6 @@ Version 2.11.0 alpha1 > Incompatible/important changes > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > -Incompatible/important changes > -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > - > - Over luxi, syntactially incorrect queries are now rejected as a whole; > before, a 'SumbmitManyJobs' request was partially executed, if the outer > structure of the request was syntactically correct. As the luxi protocol >
LGTM, thanks. Michele -- Google Germany GmbH Dienerstr. 12 80331 München Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores
