On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 04:48:04PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > Comment #5 on issue 679 by [email protected]: Common issues > documentation: gnt-network > http://code.google.com/p/ganeti/issues/detail?id=679 > > The routing table is irrelevant to gnt-network. Ganeti uses > nicparams inside the NIC object that include mode and link. In case > mode is routed, link logically points to > a routing table (same as if mode is bridged, link is a linux bridge). > > Any routing table (just like bridges) must pre-exist. In case mode > is routed Ganeti only checks if the NIC has an IP.
Sorry, I am a bit confused here. From what I understand, the routing table is irrelevant, the link argument points to it, it must pre-exist, but it's never checked by Ganeti. Is this correct? What I did was to create a 'gnt-network' with routed mode. I never created the routing table and ganeti did not create one for me, at least AFAIK. Does this sound right to you? > gnt-network defines netparams per nodegroup (during connect) which > are the nicparams > each network's NIC will inherit. To sum up setting up any routing > rules (just like brctl commands) are kvm-ifup's responsibility. You > can always create/destroy bridges and routing tables automatically > using network related hooks too. > > -- > You received this message because this project is configured to send > all issue notifications to this address. > You may adjust your notification preferences at: > https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- Jose Antonio Lopes Ganeti Engineering Google Germany GmbH Dienerstr. 12, 80331, München Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores Steuernummer: 48/725/00206 Umsatzsteueridentifikationsnummer: DE813741370
