On 9/10/05, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we try to aim for an "official" 3.0.2 release with at least the > various PHP fixes checked in? > > Matt is quite busy with work and all, and I don't mind doing a bit of > co-ordination with releases (and personally would like to see a bugfix > release of Ganglia).
Sounds like a pretty good idea; but we have to decide on how we're going to determine what we want in 3.0.2 and when we want to release it (approximately; since obviously we can change this if needed). Apart from that, probably, yes. I'll see if I can rustle up a patch for the &name=value vs &name=value URL problem for the PHP, but should it be made against CVS or 3.0.1? Regression testing might be an issue, although if it causes problems, I guess it should be possible to reverse the patch pretty easily. Also, if I don't get it done soon enough, someone else feel free to submit their own version of the patch. I don't believe that this "problem" should affect templates; it affects the actual main PHP code itself (but like I said, it's a cosmetic issue, and is found I believe only once or twice in a few internal functions). -- ~Mike - Just my two cents - No man is an island, and no man is unable.
