If your network switches are configured to do igmp, then you will
probably want to add an iptables rule like this:

iptables -A INPUT -p igmp -j ACCEPT

We have iptables configured on all of our systems running ganglia
without any problems and only have 2 related rules, the igmp one above
and a multicast rule like this:

iptables -A INPUT -p udp -m udp -d 239.2.11.71 --dport 8649 -j ACCEPT

~Jason


On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 22:47, Alex Davies wrote:
> Dear Mike,
> 
> Many thanks for your very fast reply :)
> 
> All my nodes are on the same switch, but we are using software
> firewalls. The cluster is trying to use the second ethernet port which
> is plugged into a dedicated switch, which is "trusted" and not
> supposed to be firewalled but I have a hunch that the multicasting
> thing is not going over that port, and I am not sure how to force it
> to (nor am I sure if it matters).
> 
> However, could you confirm how you forced ganglia to use your tunnel -
> particularly for the multicast packets?
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
> On 20/09/05, michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/19/05, Alex Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have been  trying to install ganglia on my 13-node cluster and had
> > > it all working wonderfully and was amazed how easilly until I
> > > restarted my firewall :)
> > 
> > This is probably impratical, and the worst advice I can give you, so
> > I'm going to BEG one of the others on the list to come up with a
> > better answer, but I can tell you that I've got Ganglia working just
> > fine over a OpenVPN tunnel (provided that peer-to-peer client
> > communication is online, and the PC hosting the OpenVPN tunnel is
> > online).  Maybe that's something you want...?  I doubt it, but I
> > figured I'd mention it anyways, just in case.
> > 
> > I'm wondering, when the firewall restarts, what happens to the
> > interfaces that Ganglia is multicasting over?  Maybe you need
> > something that automatically restarts ganglia when the firewall
> > restarts ...?  Like I said, someone else probably has a better answer.
> > 
> > My apologies for any unhelpfulnesses.
> > 
> > --
> > ~Mike
> >  - Just my two cents
> >  - No man is an island, and no man is unable.
> > 
> 

Reply via email to