On 2006-08-17 10:20:16 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 16:11 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > On 2006-08-17 09:55:38 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:46 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > > > hi,
> > > >
> > > > while we are looking into dependencies:
> > > > APR 1.x is out since quite some time and should solve many bugs.
> > > > is anyone working on that already?
> > >
> > > We're shipping apr 1.2.7 with Fedora Core 6 and RHEL5. FC5 shipped apr
> > > 1.2.2. Looks like 0.9.x for FC3/FC4/RHEL4.
> > >
> > > > another nice thing is that most old systems only ship apr0. so you can
> > > > easily provide addon packages with apr1 and the removing the intree
> > > > libraries might not hurt as much there.
> > >
> > > It gets a little fun in RH/FC, since we simply ship "apr" (no libversion
> > > attached), but yeah, the same can still be done w/an apr and a
> > > compat-apr.
> >
> > or just name the new rpms (lib)apr1 and avoid the trouble atall. i mean
> > they are unofficial/unsupported? rpms only anyway. no?:)
>
> I s'pose you could do that too. :)
guess why i was pushing towards apr1. ;)
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
