On Wednesday 12 September 2007 18:58:47 Bernard Li wrote: > On 9/12/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I suspect very few people will have metrics with a "%" in the name; [...] > > > > Actually I would suggest the other way around. The 3.0.5 branch is the > > stable branch and if this patch could destabilize it, then the patch > > shouldn't be deployed there. However, trunk is where all new development > > or patches are going. If the patch needs to be tested and proved still, > > then it should probably going into trunk. > > I think we all agree that de-stabilizing 3.0.5 is not a good thing so > I will not include this patch for 3.0.5 unless somebody strongly > disagrees.
Sure. (This is what I meant: not destabilising 3.0.x) > Paul, if you have a chance, can you check to see if the patch applies > cleanly to trunk and if needed rebase it please? Sure. I'll have a go when I next have a free moment :) Cheers, Paul. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
