>>> On 10/25/2007 at 11:06 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Brad: > > On 10/25/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> My vote would be that anything within the 3.1.x version must remain > backward compatible. If a patch breaks backward compatibility, then it must > only be applied to a future 3.x, 4.x, etc. version. > > Okay, it sounds like your vote is for compatibility across minor versions, > i.e. > > 3.1.1-9 (eg.) has to be compatible with 3.1.0 BUT > 3.0.5 will not be compatible with 3.1.0 > > correct? > > If so, I'm onboard with that. >
Correct Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
