Hi Alex: On 2/7/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the presence of the php-ctype package in the RPM database enough to > confirm that the ctype_* functions are available to PHP? > > I'm not familiar with SuSE, but on Red Hat the PHP sub-packages drop > bits of configuration in /etc/php.d when they are installed. These > contain the needed configuration lines for PHP to install the new > modules provided by the sub-package. You could have a situation where > a sub-package is installed, but the configuration file has been > removed, so it's present in the RPM database but not loaded into PHP. > Is there a similar situation in SuSE? I guess that's possible, but I don't think we can really anticipate all the scenarios that a user can shoot themselves in the foot. In the same line of argument you could say a user installed php but decided to rename the php binary :-) I'm going to just commit the fix to the spec file and leave it at that. If this causes problems down the road we'll re-visit... unless of course you plan to re-write the code without using the ctype_* functions. Cheers, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
