On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:14:17AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >>> On 7/2/2008 at 11:23 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
> Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 10:30:13AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >> >>> On 7/2/2008 at 4:34 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo 
> > Marcelo
> >> Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > The following proposed patch for stable 3.1, workaround a bug in the APR
> >> > headers in 32bit Linux that rely in off64_t being defined, which is only
> >> > the case when _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE is defined, failing otherwise with :
> >> > 
> >> >   /usr/include/apr-1.0/apr.h:273: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' 
> >> > or 
> >> > '__attribute__' before 'apr_off_t'
> >> > 
> >> > Contains changes from r1488
> >> > 
> >> > Carlo
> >> > ---
> >> 
> >> This is already being defined in the makefile.am's.  Are we missing 
> > something somewhere?  Should the -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE be removed from the 
> > makefile.am's in favor of a change to gm_metric.h? Or should it be defined 
> > in 
> > both places?
> > 
> > for now in both places (hence why it is #ifndef), because this was aimed at
> > out of tree C module builders which will have no way to know that 
> > -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE is needed for them to get a working build.
> > 
> > The next step will be to remove it from the Makefile.am for mod_example and
> > then from all in-tree modules.  Removing it from all Makefile.am will be a
> > nice to have as well, but not yet for stable 3.1, and specially not for the
> > first release of it.
> > 
> 
> OK, then I am +1

Committed revision 1499

Carlo

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers

Reply via email to