Thanks Jason, I actually have attempted to use the SRPMs first for these packages but ran into the aforementioned issues which led me to trying the RPMs. For instance when I attempt to build authd I get the following:
> $ rpmbuild -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/authd.spec > <snip> > creating config/authd > creating config.h > + make 'RPM_OPT_FLAGS=-O2 -g' > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I. -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -g -c auth.c > auth.c:31:23: error: e/e_error.h: No such file or directory > auth.c:32:19: error: e/net.h: No such file or directory > auth.c: In function ‘auth_get_signature’: > auth.c:49: error: ‘UNIX_PATH_MAX’ undeclared (first use in this function) > auth.c:49: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > auth.c:49: error: for each function it appears in.) > auth.c:52: warning: implicit declaration of function > ‘net_cli_unixsock_create’ > auth.c:53: error: ‘E_OK’ undeclared (first use in this function) > auth.c:55: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘net_send_bytes’ > auth.c:59: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘net_recv_bytes’ > auth.c:49: warning: unused variable ‘auth_sock_path’ > make: *** [auth.o] Error 1 > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.53286 (%build) > > > RPM build errors: > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.53286 (%build) Again, thanks for the help and any guidance on this. -Joe Jason A. Smith wrote: > Hi Joe, > > I am not exactly sure what started you on these dependency problems, but > whenever you have problems like this from binary rpms that someone else > built on an unknown OS, it is probably best to find the source rpm and > rebuild it on your local system. Then, if you have all of the build > dependencies and it compiles okay, you should have no problems > installing the binary rpm that you built. > > The RHEL4 server I checked has two versions of openssl installed, > probably the current one at the time RHEL4 was released, and an older > version for backwards compatibility with older applications: > > # ls -l /lib/libcrypto.so.* > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 824272 Sep 28 2006 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6b > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 945120 Oct 22 2007 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Oct 23 2007 /lib/libcrypto.so.2 -> > libcrypto.so.0.9.6b > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Oct 23 2007 /lib/libcrypto.so.4 -> > libcrypto.so.0.9.7a > > # rpm -qf /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6b > openssl-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_6.1.i686 > openssl096b-0.9.6b-22.46.i386 > > > ~Jason > > > On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 17:05 -0500, Joe Williams wrote: > >> Thanks Jason, I am certainly seeing the same thing on a centos5 machine. >> I attempted to symlink the current libraries into libcrypto.so.2 and >> libssl.so.2 but that didn't seem to work. For that matter I checked a >> centos4 machine and it seems to use libcrypto.so.4 and I do not get the >> same result as your first example. Is there a solution that most ganglia >> and RHEL5 users use to ameliorate this issue? >> >> thanks. >> -Joe >> >> >> Jason A. Smith wrote: >> >>> If you have the rpmdb-redhat package installed, then you can query rpm >>> to see what package RedHat distributes which provides the requested >>> capability, even if the package is not installed. For example, on a >>> RHEL4 server, I get: >>> >>> $ rpm --redhatprovides libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2 >>> openssl096b-0.9.6b-22.46.i386 >>> openssl096b-0.9.6b-22.46.i386 >>> >>> You can do the same rpm command on RHEL5: >>> >>> $ rpm --redhatprovides libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2 >>> no package provides libcrypto.so.2 >>> no package provides libssl.so.2 >>> >>> Or you can use yum: >>> >>> $ yum whatprovides libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2 >>> No Matches found >>> >>> But it doesn't look like RHEL5 provides that old version of openssl. >>> >>> ~Jason >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 14:52 -0500, Joe Williams wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I am seeing the following issue with authd: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ganglia]# rpm -qa | grep openssl >>>>> openssl-devel-0.9.8b-8.3.el5_0.2 >>>>> openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5_0.2 >>>>> openssl-devel-0.9.8b-8.3.el5_0.2 >>>>> openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5_0.2 >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ganglia]# rpm -ivh authd-0.2.1-1.i386.rpm >>>>> error: Failed dependencies: >>>>> libcrypto.so.2 is needed by authd-0.2.1-1.i386 >>>>> libssl.so.2 is needed by authd-0.2.1-1.i386 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> What libraries need to be installed for this installation? >>>> >>>> thanks. >>>> -Joe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- Name: Joseph A. Williams Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-general mailing list Ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-general
