Anyone have any clues on this?

Thanks.
-Joe


Joe Williams wrote:
> I have been able to get a bit further. After finding this post to the 
> developers list:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02443.html
>
> Specifically:
>
>   
>> The gexec-0.3.6 available from http://www.theether.org/gexec does not
>> build with 3.0.* versions of Ganglia. It builds correctly only with 2.*
>> versions. If you want to build with Ganglia 3, edit the gexec.c to include
>> /usr/include/ganglia.h and not /usr/include/ganglia/gexec_funcs.h. Of
>> course, you have to have ganglia-devel installed for this to work. Another
>> thing, in addition to the above, you have to add #include <e/llist.h> to
>> gexec.c in order to successfully build the gexec.
>>   
>>     
>
> I made the modifications and it still did not build properly due to 
> <e/llist.h> missing. An 'rpm -ql libe' showed that it was not included 
> in that package. So I copied it from the repo mentioned in the above 
> email 
> (http://svn.oscar.openclustergroup.org/svn/oscar-soc/soc-2006/hpcmetrics/ganglia/src/lib/llist.h).
>  
> Once done I was able to get further in the build but it then failed at:
>
>   
>> gcc: /usr/lib/libganglia.a: No such file or directory
>>     
> So I symlinked /usr/lib64/libganglia.a to /usr/lib/libganglia.a
>
> Next it failed at:
>
>   
>> $ rpmbuild -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/gexec.spec
>> <snip>
>> gexec.c: In function ‘main’:
>> gexec.c:324: warning: ‘ips’ may be used uninitialized in this function
>> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.    -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -g 
>> -D_GNU_SOURCE -DDEBUG -c gexec_options.c
>> gcc  -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -g -D_GNU_SOURCE -DDEBUG  -o gexec -L. 
>> gexec.o gexec_options.o -lpthread -lgexec -le -lauth -lssl -lcrypto 
>> /usr/lib/libganglia.a -lssl -lpthread -lcrypto
>> /usr/lib/libganglia.a(ganglia.o): In function `gexec_cluster':
>> (.text+0x10c): undefined reference to `XML_ParserCreate'
>> /usr/lib/libganglia.a(ganglia.o): In function `gexec_cluster':
>> (.text+0x160): undefined reference to `XML_SetElementHandler'
>> /usr/lib/libganglia.a(ganglia.o): In function `gexec_cluster':
>> (.text+0x16b): undefined reference to `XML_SetUserData'
>> /usr/lib/libganglia.a(ganglia.o): In function `gexec_cluster':
>> (.text+0x178): undefined reference to `XML_GetBuffer'
>> /usr/lib/libganglia.a(ganglia.o): In function `gexec_cluster':
>> (.text+0x1c4): undefined reference to `XML_ParserFree'
>> /usr/lib/libganglia.a(ganglia.o): In function `gexec_cluster':
>> (.text+0x1f6): undefined reference to `XML_ParseBuffer'
>> /usr/lib/libganglia.a(ganglia.o): In function `gexec_cluster':
>> (.text+0x265): undefined reference to `XML_GetErrorCode'
>> /usr/lib/libganglia.a(ganglia.o): In function `gexec_cluster':
>> (.text+0x26c): undefined reference to `XML_ErrorString'
>> /usr/lib/libganglia.a(ganglia.o): In function `gexec_cluster':
>> (.text+0x277): undefined reference to `XML_GetCurrentLineNumber'
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> make: *** [gexec] Error 1
>>     
>
> This is where I am stuck for now, any ideas would be helpful. Also, is 
> it normal to run into these issues when building gexec and etc or am I 
> off base? If I am doing something wrong please let me know. Has anyone 
> else ran into these issues building gexec on centos5?
>
> Thanks.
> -Joe
>
>
>
> Joe Williams wrote:
>   
>> Jason,
>>
>> The authd SRPM I downloaded is located at 
>> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=43021&package_id=36388&release_id=88941
>>
>> Since it is side by side with the other ganglia downloads I figured this 
>> was the place to ask.
>>
>> It looks like it was caused by libe missing, I have built and installed 
>> it as well as authd. I just attempted to build gexec and it fails:
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> $  rpmbuild -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/gexec.spec
>>> <snip>
>>> creating gexec.spec
>>> creating config.h
>>> + make ROOT=/var/tmp/gexec-0.3.6-1-buildroot 'RPM_OPT_FLAGS=-O2 -g'
>>> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.    -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -g 
>>> -D_GNU_SOURCE -DDEBUG -c gexec_lib.c
>>> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.    -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -g 
>>> -D_GNU_SOURCE -DDEBUG -c request.c
>>> rm -f libgexec.a
>>> ar cru libgexec.a gexec_lib.o request.o
>>> ranlib libgexec.a
>>> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.    -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -g 
>>> -D_GNU_SOURCE -DDEBUG -c gexec.c
>>> gexec.c:39:33: error: ganglia/gexec_funcs.h: No such file or directory
>>> gexec.c: In function ‘ips_create_ganglia’:
>>> gexec.c:151: error: ‘gexec_cluster_t’ undeclared (first use in this 
>>> function)
>>> gexec.c:151: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>>> gexec.c:151: error: for each function it appears in.)
>>> gexec.c:151: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘cluster’
>>> gexec.c:152: error: ‘gexec_host_t’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> gexec.c:152: error: ‘host’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> gexec.c:153: error: ‘llist_entry’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> gexec.c:153: error: ‘lli’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> gexec.c:161: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘gexec_cluster’
>>> gexec.c:161: error: ‘cluster’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> gexec.c:165: warning: implicit declaration of function 
>>> ‘gexec_cluster_free’
>>> gexec.c:174: error: expected expression before ‘)’ token
>>> gexec.c: In function ‘ips_create_local_ganglia’:
>>> gexec.c:199: error: ‘gexec_cluster_t’ undeclared (first use in this 
>>> function)
>>> gexec.c:199: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘cluster’
>>> gexec.c:200: error: ‘gexec_host_t’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> gexec.c:200: error: ‘host’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> gexec.c:201: error: ‘llist_entry’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> gexec.c:201: error: ‘lli’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> gexec.c:205: error: ‘cluster’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> gexec.c:217: error: expected expression before ‘)’ token
>>> make: *** [gexec.o] Error 1
>>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2725 (%build)
>>>
>>>
>>> RPM build errors:
>>>     Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2725 (%build)
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ganglia]# rpm -qa | grep ganglia
>>> ganglia-gmond-3.0.7-1
>>> ganglia-devel-3.0.7-1
>>> ganglia-gmetad-3.0.7-1
>>>     
>>>       
>> Locate returns nothing for 'gexec_funcs.h'.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> -Joe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jason A. Smith wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 17:35 -0500, Joe Williams wrote:
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Thanks Jason,
>>>>
>>>> I actually have attempted to use the SRPMs first for these packages but 
>>>> ran into the aforementioned issues which led me to trying the RPMs. For 
>>>> instance when I attempt to build authd I get the following:
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>>> $ rpmbuild -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/authd.spec
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>> creating config/authd
>>>>> creating config.h
>>>>> + make 'RPM_OPT_FLAGS=-O2 -g'
>>>>> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.    -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -g -c auth.c
>>>>> auth.c:31:23: error: e/e_error.h: No such file or directory
>>>>> auth.c:32:19: error: e/net.h: No such file or directory
>>>>>       
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>> The important error is above, basically you are missing a *-devel or
>>> other lib package (you need all build dependencies when rebuilding
>>> source rpms).  The spec file is clearly missing a BuildRequires line.  I
>>> am not exactly sure where this is coming from or where this authd you
>>> are trying to build came from, but this might be what you are looking
>>> for:
>>>
>>> http://www.theether.org/libe/
>>>
>>> What does this have to do with ganglia?
>>>
>>> ~Jason
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>>> auth.c: In function ‘auth_get_signature’:
>>>>> auth.c:49: error: ‘UNIX_PATH_MAX’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>>>> auth.c:49: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>>>>> auth.c:49: error: for each function it appears in.)
>>>>> auth.c:52: warning: implicit declaration of function 
>>>>> ‘net_cli_unixsock_create’
>>>>> auth.c:53: error: ‘E_OK’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>>>> auth.c:55: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘net_send_bytes’
>>>>> auth.c:59: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘net_recv_bytes’
>>>>> auth.c:49: warning: unused variable ‘auth_sock_path’
>>>>> make: *** [auth.o] Error 1
>>>>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.53286 (%build)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> RPM build errors:
>>>>>     Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.53286 (%build)
>>>>>       
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>> Again, thanks for the help and any guidance on this.
>>>>
>>>> -Joe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jason A. Smith wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>>> Hi Joe,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not exactly sure what started you on these dependency problems, but
>>>>> whenever you have problems like this from binary rpms that someone else
>>>>> built on an unknown OS, it is probably best to find the source rpm and
>>>>> rebuild it on your local system.  Then, if you have all of the build
>>>>> dependencies and it compiles okay, you should have no problems
>>>>> installing the binary rpm that you built.
>>>>>
>>>>> The RHEL4 server I checked has two versions of openssl installed,
>>>>> probably the current one at the time RHEL4 was released, and an older
>>>>> version for backwards compatibility with older applications:
>>>>>
>>>>> # ls -l /lib/libcrypto.so.*
>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 824272 Sep 28  2006 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6b
>>>>> -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 945120 Oct 22  2007 /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     19 Oct 23  2007 /lib/libcrypto.so.2 -> 
>>>>> libcrypto.so.0.9.6b
>>>>> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     19 Oct 23  2007 /lib/libcrypto.so.4 -> 
>>>>> libcrypto.so.0.9.7a
>>>>>
>>>>> # rpm -qf /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7a /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6b
>>>>> openssl-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_6.1.i686
>>>>> openssl096b-0.9.6b-22.46.i386
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ~Jason
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 17:05 -0500, Joe Williams wrote:
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Thanks Jason, I am certainly seeing the same thing on a centos5 machine. 
>>>>>> I attempted to symlink the current libraries into libcrypto.so.2 and 
>>>>>> libssl.so.2 but that didn't seem to work. For that matter I checked a 
>>>>>> centos4 machine and it seems to use libcrypto.so.4 and I do not get the 
>>>>>> same result as your first example. Is there a solution that most ganglia 
>>>>>> and RHEL5 users use to ameliorate this issue?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason A. Smith wrote:
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> If you have the rpmdb-redhat package installed, then you can query rpm
>>>>>>> to see what package RedHat distributes which provides the requested
>>>>>>> capability, even if the package is not installed.  For example, on a
>>>>>>> RHEL4 server, I get:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ rpm --redhatprovides libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2
>>>>>>> openssl096b-0.9.6b-22.46.i386
>>>>>>> openssl096b-0.9.6b-22.46.i386
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can do the same rpm command on RHEL5:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ rpm --redhatprovides libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2
>>>>>>> no package provides libcrypto.so.2
>>>>>>> no package provides libssl.so.2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or you can use yum:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ yum whatprovides libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2 
>>>>>>> No Matches found
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But it doesn't look like RHEL5 provides that old version of openssl.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~Jason
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 14:52 -0500, Joe Williams wrote:
>>>>>>>   
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> I am seeing the following issue with authd:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ganglia]# rpm -qa | grep openssl
>>>>>>>>> openssl-devel-0.9.8b-8.3.el5_0.2
>>>>>>>>> openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5_0.2
>>>>>>>>> openssl-devel-0.9.8b-8.3.el5_0.2
>>>>>>>>> openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5_0.2
>>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ganglia]# rpm -ivh authd-0.2.1-1.i386.rpm
>>>>>>>>> error: Failed dependencies:
>>>>>>>>>     libcrypto.so.2 is needed by authd-0.2.1-1.i386
>>>>>>>>>     libssl.so.2 is needed by authd-0.2.1-1.i386
>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> What libraries need to be installed for this installation?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>                 
>>   
>>     
>
>   

-- 
Name: Joseph A. Williams
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-general mailing list
Ganglia-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-general

Reply via email to