tin gherdanarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm somewhat incontent with the hyperspec. It lacks examples > and the wording reminds me to that of CCCITT-lawyers. I guess > the traffic on comp.lang.lisp would drop by 50 % if there was > a better hyperspec. So here is an idea.
As far as I know, the ANSI CL standard, on which the text of the HyperSpec is based, is often praised as a good technical document. > BUT: There are legal issues involved. I'm pretty sure lisp.org There are more legal issues and implications than you think. Paolo -- Lisp Propulsion Laboratory log - http://www.paoloamoroso.it/log _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
