Peter Herth wrote: > The hyperspec has its place as the pure technical reference. Of > course, with a complex language like Common Lisp, this makes for a > complex documentation.
This may seem strange, but the text of Common Lisp the Language, 2nd edition is quite readable (and searchable in pdf form). Of course it's a little out of date. I know they share a lot of language, but is it any less encumbered than the Hyperspec? Matt -- "You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother." — Albert Einstein. _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
