Does anybody else think it would be a good idea to get a c-l.net
project set up for CLX? The current situation seems to be telent-clx
being the most modern CLX available and the portable-clx mail list
being around for coordinating patches, but that list hasn't seen much
traffic for some months.
I'm probably not really the most qualified one to start something like
that up (certainly there are more logical candidates) but I thought I
would sound out opinion and see if there is agreement that CLX needs an
organized project development home. If so, I can at least try and get
the ball rolling on c-l.net.
FWIW, I'm working on getting a LaTeX version of the CLX manual, both
because I need to read it and to hopefully produce a "central" version
to update in the future. I started to convert Gilbert's SGML version
into LaTeX more or less manually and that's going fairly well, but does
anybody know if the texinfo version in the telent-clx tarball is as new
or newer? There are automatic texinfo->LaTeX tools I believe, and that
might make life easier.
Cheers,
CY
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Gardeners mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
