--- Robert Strandh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea to create a cl.net project
> for CLX, but I think Dan Barlow and the other CLX maintainers
> should have their say first.
Good idea. Are they all on the portable-clx list?
> I suspect there is some very recent Texinfo version out
> there.
OK, I'll check the telent version.
> The reason for that is that many of us think that Texinfo is
> preferable to LaTeX when it comes to documentation like this.
> Personally, I would like to go the other way with the McCLIM
> documentation, and, although Texinfo is by no means perfect,
> I think it is the best thing we have at the moment.
OK, whatever works better. I suspect it will be a while before I try
turning CLX into a literate program in any case ;-).
> For that reason, I think you might want to reconsider turning
> it into a LaTeX version, which would then invariably get out
> of sync with the Texinfo version, and instead you might want
> to make sure there is a recent Texinfo version available.
Just curious - what are the main advantages of texinfo for something
like this? (Well, OK, I guess Emacs integration is an obvious one...)
Cheers,
CY
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Gardeners mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
