> I have to say I'm not convinced that defining a new markup language is > a good idea. My issue with this is that the markup language is only > part of the equation. Possibly of more importance is a suitable > authoring environment.
Sure, but typing docbook markup is not exactly the most exciting part of writing documentation. There are pseudo html markup for "writers" that automatically produce html through Perl for ex. I write a lot of html by hand and I know I'd love to have a simple way to write formatting/structure information. And I really don't care much about the output as long as the input is simple enough for my fingers. Plus it's got to have a lisp like syntax otherwise it won't work nicely for people who are user to write a lot of lisp. Well, I don't really know about that but I figure that it would just be like typin/ applying functions to strings. JC Helary _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
