--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've wondered that too, especially as I have my own test\ > > framework that I think highly of. ;-) > > Don't we all! > > > Anyway, do you want to get the ball rolling by creating the > > Gardeners Reports project page and starting the various > > lists of reports written, being written, and to be written? > > And maybe create an outline page for the test framework > > report. > > I'll happily volunteer my efforts to this as well. > > If C.Y. doesn't want to make the pages, I can do that later > tonight. C.Y., please let me know. Go for it - I'll probably be too busy in the short term. I'll take a look and see if I can make any suggestions/tweaks (or if neither one of us can do it immediately, first one there does it ;-) My immediate problem is I don't know what makes a "good" unit test tool. FiveAM has been characterized as being more "lisp-like", a couple take after JUnit, RT has been around roughly since dirt was invented, and a few other tidbits have trickled down but that still doesn't tell me what a "good" framework is. Can someone who has used (or written ;-) one or more comment on what logical "figures of merit" might be? Cheers, CY __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
