> My immediate problem is I don't know what makes a "good" unit test > tool. FiveAM has been characterized as being more "lisp-like", a > couple take after JUnit, RT has been around roughly since dirt was > invented, and a few other tidbits have trickled down but that still > doesn't tell me what a "good" framework is. Can someone who has used > (or written ;-) one or more comment on what logical "figures of merit" > might be?
I'm thinking that it would be a Good Idea to take a small chunk of code and write tests for it in each of the existing systems. ideally, the code will be interesting enough to exercise the envelope (I hate flabby envelopes). -- Gary Warren King metabang.com http://www.metabang.com/ _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
