This makes me wonder. Wouldn't cliki.net be better? I think it just needs a cleaner layout (more horizontal space!), a better organized front page and someone to maintain the code (I recall someone somewhere volunteering to do this, not sure what happened about that).
I was the one volunteering. I never heard back from anyone regarding where the source code was or how I could contribute. I'm still interested in doing this. In fact, I'm even more interested since I don't think that a Lisp wiki should be tied to a single vendor's Lisp implementation.
Do you mean cliki.net the site or the Cliki software? Because the site is devoted to Open source and free Lisp which seems a bit limited for our purposes. Also, from a community building point of view, it seems a feature to me that the ALU Wiki was so unused until we showed up--there's little chance that we'll be stepping on anyone's toes no matter what we do with this Wiki.
I think Peter is spot on regarding this; the CLiki and the ALU Wiki both could use a lot of code / feature improvements but they serve different constituencies. I'd almost like to suggest that Gardeners have their own Wiki but that would involve someone hosting it and I don't think I can do that right now...
-- Gary Warren King metabang.com http://www.metabang.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
