Well, as a lurker whose vote should count next to nothing, I'm particularly fond of lisp-unit.
That said, I will almost certainly switch to whatever testing framework you choose. I'd like nothing more than to consolidate *that* part of my Standard Utility Library as well. -- gak On Jun 11, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Chris Dean wrote: > > One goal we have (well, at least I have) for the Standardized Utility > Library is to have unit tests for its functions and macros. > > I'd like to write them using just one unit testing framework, does > anyone have a preference of what framework we use? This is a well > discussed area, but if you have a preference and are planning on > contributing to this project please cast your vote for your favorite > testing framework. > > I was thinking we would use one of: > > - RT: The classic solution. > - FiveAM: Part of the Arnesi suite. > - Peter's test framework: A minimalist choice that could grow as we > needed features. From his Practical Common Lisp book > http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/practical-building-a-unit-test- > framework.html > > Other options are listed here: > > http://www.cl-user.net/asp/tags/unit-testing > > I normally use FiveAM. > > Cheers, > Chris Dean > _______________________________________________ > Gardeners mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners > _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
