I should probably mention this: http://wiki.alu.org/Test_Frameworks
--- Gary Klimowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, as a lurker whose vote should count next to nothing, I'm > particularly fond of lisp-unit. > > That said, I will almost certainly switch to whatever testing > framework you choose. I'd like nothing more than to consolidate > *that* part of my Standard Utility Library as well. > > -- > gak > > > On Jun 11, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Chris Dean wrote: > > > > > One goal we have (well, at least I have) for the Standardized > Utility > > Library is to have unit tests for its functions and macros. > > > > I'd like to write them using just one unit testing framework, does > > anyone have a preference of what framework we use? This is a well > > discussed area, but if you have a preference and are planning on > > contributing to this project please cast your vote for your > favorite > > testing framework. > > > > I was thinking we would use one of: > > > > - RT: The classic solution. > > - FiveAM: Part of the Arnesi suite. > > - Peter's test framework: A minimalist choice that could grow as we > > needed features. From his Practical Common Lisp book > > http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/practical-building-a-unit-test- > > framework.html > > > > Other options are listed here: > > > > http://www.cl-user.net/asp/tags/unit-testing > > > > I normally use FiveAM. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris Dean > > _______________________________________________ > > Gardeners mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gardeners mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
