On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 00:54 +0200, Marek Kubica wrote: > On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:13:27 -0300 > nubis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Marek, you look like you've already been through this :) what > > toolchain do you think would be the most django-esque, technical and > > documentation-wise? > > No, I haven't yet used either Lisp for the Web, just watched > screencasts of UCW (which does not seem too Django-like, I suspect its > more comparable with Seaside) and Lisp on Lines. yup, I agree, UCW is more like seaside, maybe I'm just messed up, but I just find it 'anti natural', too different from what I use and already like, and in part I don't trust they can disguise a stateless protocol as stateful, (I don't even know if that's their main goal, nor tried it to back my sayings, just to busy to try it for real), I know this seaside friend who instead of traditional 'cookie based' sessions or similar approaches, relies on the tcp connection, requiring login if it's interrupted or lost, I think it makes it a little harder to scale among other downsides ... maybe I should stop badmouthing them until I get informed. > The thing is: while > you most probably can get a lot of great code that can compete > technically, the Django developers have worked at a newspaper and had > since the beginning a big focus on really nice documentation. This is > something that you will not encounter that often in the Lisp world, at > least I haven't. Of course, there are some exceptions where the authors > do provide comprehensive documentation. > > regards, > Marek
rats!, still I expected that answer, I may even be able to tend that part of the garden :), now, back to the two nice tutorials I found here http://www.newartisans.com/blog_files/common.lisp.with.apache.php http://www.newartisans.com/blog_files/hunchentoot.primer.php thangs all ----nubis :) http://woobiz.com.ar _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
