On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 00:14 +0200, Lars Rune Nøstdal wrote: > On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 19:52 -0300, nubis wrote: > > Hi, me again: > > can anyone recommend me the 'simplest' (as in, > > will-later-find-myself-doing-ad-hoc-stuff-but-it-was-easy-to-grasp-at-first) > > web framework for common lisp? there are plenty to choose from, but I > > don't have time to test them all, and I have a small project that I would > > like to start coding in common lisp, but I want the less 'protocolar' one, > > I've worked with 'mvc' style frameworks this far, but any other paradigm > > will do, as long as its lightweight and has passable documentation. > > > > thanks! > > I still don't trust myself to evaluate this kind of things in lisp, and > > want to start as fast as possible, sorry for my newbie-ism. > > not sure it's a web-framework or whatever .. it's more of a ajax/comet > framework maybe .. i dunno, but anyway: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SymbolicWeb / > http://groups.google.com/group/symbolicweb > > it's simple imho .. no continuations, just a state machine or > whatever .. plain hunchentoot etc. > > it has a "real-time" feel to it like lisp itself .. don't have to think > about or in terms of http requests and responses while doing development >
Thanks all for your replies, right now I'm trying hunchentoot, its good but it kind of lacks some abstraction to allow the type of development I'm used to, I'm looking into Nick Allen's cl-terrace for that, with good expectations. thanks all again. -- ----nubis :) http://woobiz.com.ar _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
