Tom 

>From my experiences I have learned that many unexpected problems caused by 
>high temperature and reducing atmosphere can come after 500 - 2000 - 8000 
>hours.
I would be surprised if no new unexpected problems would show up after 15000 - 
30000 hours operation. 

I can only agree that we should applaud any body that can make a gasifier that 
can operate for 600 hours - but we should remember that we are far from 
commercial products at this stage 
 
Best regards

Thomas Koch 
 

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] På vegne af Tom Miles
Sendt: 29. juni 2012 02:59
Til: 'Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification'
Emne: Re: [Gasification] Identifying and fixing technical and commercial 
roadblocks to commercial small-scale CHP gasifiers

David,

Generally if a piece of equipment can get through commercial production for
600 hours you will have discovered most of the unanticipated problems.  It 
usually takes a couple of months of round the clock production to get to that 
point. Beyond that it takes another couple of thousand hours to verify 
operation and increase reliability. When you're hitting over 90% production 
every 24 hour day then it should get boring. With industrial biomass systems 
fuel quality, fuel sizing, drying, and feeding account for about 95% of the 
unintended stoppages/outages/downtime. If you are ready for commercial 
production then you have already solved the downstream problems like figuring 
out how to make good quality gas, gas cleaning and cooling, and gas use, 
whether it is a boiler or engine.

The variety of biomass feedstocks in type, form size and availability is 
usually a challenge. A device is often developed on fuels with certain 
specifications. When things fail vendors complain that the fuel was non-spec. 
It happens all the time but it doesn't really help anybody. As a supplier you 
have to be prepared to supply or specify the fuel system along with the 
reactor. 

A major challenge for development companies has less to do with the technology 
and more to do with how you run a business. Some are business failures more 
than technology failures.  People just have different talents for running 
startup businesses. Technology developers chronically waste a lot of money up 
front, delay in building and testing prototypes, have slow turnarounds on 
improvements, use equipment that won't stand up to the abrasiveness of biomass, 
etc. It doesn't take long before you run out of money. As in other businesses 
the good strategy is probably to develop a good product and then sell it to a 
company in a similar business, like a boiler company, that can take advantage 
of manufacturing capabilities that are used to produce other products. 

Sometimes the gasifier is just a "money magnet," a piece of pretty steel to 
attract investors. It is assumed that you can get it to work was you burn 
through the start-up funding. Sometimes it seems like we are very inefficient 
at using money invested in gasification but we may be no different than other 
industries.  

A common mistake is to try to export a gasification products too soon. In other 
equipment we say that you need to develop a domestic market before you try to 
export it. In the 1970s we saw a lot of gasifiers start out in universities 
then the prototypes were exported to developing companies before they were 
fully developed. Usually they rusted there unless the engineer or scientist who 
developed them showed up. Then they are very expensive to try to improve or 
maintain. 

We have many companies offering gasifiers have built one prototype and claim 
performance well beyond their demonstrated capabilities. It's fine for the 
prototypes and the first several commercial units to fail as along as the 
supplier stays with it and makes things work. We tend to criticize prototypes 
or initial installations that fail. We should applaud the success of those who 
have recovered from the failure by identifying the problem an
designing around it in time to get back into production.   We all have
failures as we develop new systems. Sometimes developers can't continue 
development because the client has failed financially. Usually the grant money 
runs out before you get through commissioning.

Those are just some of the many hazards in developing gasification systems.
Add all that to a limited and fickle market and it's actually a pretty high 
risk activity. As they say, to make a small fortune in gasification you need to 
start with a large fortune.

Tom     

   

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Coote
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 5:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Gasification] Identifying and fixing technical and commercial 
roadblocks to commercial small-scale CHP gasifiers

Thanks, Tom.

A very useful study would be identifying at good resolution the reasons why 
small-scale CHP gasifiers fail technically and/or struggle commercially.
Once that's clearly established suitable focus can be brought to bear on what 
is going wrong between pilot/demonstration and commercial phases with a view to 
fixing the issues. I think the same could apply to 2nd generation biofuels.

Regards

David

> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] P? vegne af Tom 
> Miles
> Sendt: 28. juni 2012 03:14
> Til: 'Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification'
> Emne: Re: [Gasification] Which of the gasifiers Tom listed are meeting 
> Knoef's commercial criteria
>
> David,
>
> It looks like you have the makings of a survey. :-/
>
> Harrie's criteria are good and would be difficult for most suppliers 
> to
meet. We want gasifiers to be as readily installed and operated as boilers.
>
> We should determine what needs to be done to get more suppliers over 
> all
of these hurdles.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
>
>    


_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address 
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenerg
ylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/



_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address 
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to