Thanks Doug, given the level of prior art reinventing the wheel is an occupational hazard. Yes we have observed what you describe, the point of differentiation though is where we were starting on straight (dry) wood chips each run rather than charcoal from the previous run. It became clear that substantial improvements in gas calorific value and useful volume were possible that we seemed to be missing out on. It was study of this that led to the refinements in design we now enjoy the benefits of.

Cheers,
Peter


On 3/13/2014 6:37 PM, Doug wrote:
Hi Peter and Gasification Colleagues.

On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:22:02 +1100
Peter Davies <[email protected]> wrote:

snip<
  Part of
the development path we followed was understanding why with our early
pilot systems gas the quality was higher in the period immediately after
start-up when the system had first settled, then declined to a lower
equilibrium, conventional wisdom being that this was a bed porosity
change over time (ash/fine particle build up). We found this was only
part of what was going on, hence the advances we have made.
snip<
You describe a normal behaviour for packed bed gasifiers. They start up on 
quality char made overnight from the endothermic heat released on shut down. 
There are always situations where fuel moisture will condense as it cools then 
run down the hopper walls and saturate the start-up char. It's good reason to 
use fuel as dry as possible, then stop the gasifier at a lower fuel level, 
never with a full hopper.

Dry start-up char will get the exothermic heat going quickly to be available to 
carbonise the incoming raw fuel, then as the heat budget begins to build, the 
whole gasifier must then become heat soaked before the exothermic heat can 
return to the gas making. If you had a gas analyser on line with appropriately 
placed T.C.'s, you can watch the two lines of data swapping places in almost 
real time. Gas analysers measure after the event, while T.C.'s are as it 
happens. The trick is to correlate this data by watching the bed movement and 
it's colours.

Bed dynamics like you describe do cause problems, but these are also factors of 
poor design and process understanding. How individual development programmes 
deal with this decides their fate, but pleased to hear that all this is behind 
you. We need winners, not egg on our faces(:-)

Hope this might be of assistance.

Doug Williams,
Fluidyne Gasification.



--
Peter Davies
Director
ID Gasifiers Pty Ltd
Delegate River, Victoria
Australia
Ph: 0402 845 295


_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to