Ok, Zeb! Gosh! You have me questioning my own position on this. You raise some 
very good points concerning the UAA vs the university. Man, are you a lawyer or 
some thing? :-)

----------
Sent from AT&T's Wireless network using Mobile Email

------Original Message------
From: John Vega <zebu...@gate.net>
To: <gatortalk@googlegroups.com>
Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010 3:39:05 PM GMT-0400
Subject: Re: [gatortalk] Re: [gatornews] [SUN]: 6/17 06:01 --- UF statues to    
honor Heisman winners [Crabbe]


On Jun 17, 2010, at 3:18 PM, oli...@bobparks.com wrote:

> That is why it's called a donation. Giving more money to the  
> university could be justified in any year, not just this year when  
> things are bad.

If the UAA were part of the University, it would be called a budget.

But for the University, the UAA would not earn a dime. Semi-pro  
football founders, and even minor league baseball has trouble making  
money (with better players than play NCAA ball).

So, I have trouble understanding that, when an arm of the University  
comes in under-budget, why not spending more money is considered a  
"donation."


> Actually, the UAA gives more money than most other schools get out  
> of their sports programs. Besides, who do you think funds softball,  
> soccer and lacrosse? Ticket sales? Not only the sports, but all the  
> scholarships related to ALL of the non-revenue sports at UF are  
> funded by UAA.

Well, OK, but how does this matter? Wouldn't they be part of the  
athletic department budget at another school? Money is fungible.

I think your real point is that football pays for everything. Fine,  
but understand that a football-only athletic department would have  
serious Title IX problems, and that the non-revenue women's sports  
could reasonably be considered a part of the cost of operating the  
football program.

> The vast majority of colleges don't do that, nor do they even run  
> in the black in any given year. That takes money directly away from  
> professors at f$U.

Does the financial success of the UF football program depend upon:
1. our students and alumni
2. our success on the field
3. the adroitness of the UAA?

I recall selling out Florida Field in 1979 when we were 0-10-1. I  
have trouble believing that, but for the UAA, we would not have the  
same football revenue. Maybe we should pull a Vandy, and bring all of  
athletics in-house.

-Zeb

-- 
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions   |   
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us

-- 
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
2008 National Football Champions   |   
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us

Reply via email to