Kelly Morris, Monday, June 30, 2008
Anal infection with human papilloma virus (HPV) is more prevalent in
heterosexual men than previously thought, according to a US study published in
the June 15th edition of the Journal of Infectious Diseases.
As with genital HPV, previous estimates of prevalence of anal HPV have varied
widely. Although some studies have reported between 1.2% and 8% prevalence in
asymptomatic men who report no sex with other men, prevalence of anal HPV was
found to be 46% in a 2003 cross-sectional study of 50 HIV-positive heterosexual
male injection drug users with no reported history of anal intercourse.
US investigators studied a cohort of men aged 18-40, recruited from both the
community and sexual health clinics, who reported having sex with a woman in
the preceding year. Participants completed a questionnaire including potential
risk factors, and researchers used rigorous sampling techniques to check
genital and anal sites for HPV. The infection was detected by PCR to identify
DNA and then genotyped for 37 types of which 13 are associated with cancer. Any
HPV not fitting these types was labelled as unclassified.
Out of the study population of 463 men, 253 either admitted sex with other men
or did not answer the question, and were excluded from this analysis. The
remaining 222 men were divided into a case group of men with anal HPV and a
comparison group of men with or without genital HPV only. Men with only
unclassified HPV at anal sites were also excluded.
Anal HPV was found in 24.8% of men, and 33% of these men had infection with a
strain of HPV that has been linked with an increased risk of anal cancer..
Although nine men had visible warts or lesions at genital sites none of the
participants had these signs at anal sites.
In a multivariate model, lifetime number of female sexual partners (odds ratio
3.66, 95% CI 1.06-12.62, for 11-20 compared with 1-5 partners) and frequency of
sex in the preceding month (OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.03-14.63 for 2-4 times compared
with 0-1 times) were independently and significantly associated with presence
of anal HPV.
However, participants who reported a greater frequency of sex in the past month
were found to be not at increased risk of anal HPV, which might suggest that
they were in a monogamous relationship. The analysis also found that
circumcision was marginally associated with a reduced risk of anal HPV.
These findings parallel research in women and in gay men and other men who have
sex with men. However in gay men, anal HPV affects all age groups equally,
whereas the current study found that the prevalence of anal HPV is lower in
those aged 30-40 compared with younger men.
Although this is the largest study of its kind, the authors acknowledge that
the study was not large enough for a clear understanding of the full complement
of risk factors. They also acknowledge the possibility of false-positive
results; that DNA might have been detected from the skin surface without true
infection; and the possibility that some participants may not have reported
sexual behaviours with other men.
They suggest that future studies should collect sexual and non-sexual exposure
information that may clarify transmission routes – for example, behaviours that
involve self- or partner-initiated anal-digital contact.
The authors conclude that the findings should not be used to change clinical
practice currently, but further research is necessary, especially to determine
factors linked with the persistence of cancer-causing anal HPV in younger and
older men.
Reference
Nyitray A et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for anal Human Papillomavirus
infection in heterosexual men J Infect Dis 197: 1676-84, 2008.
Best Jokes, Best Friends, Best Food and more. Go to
http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/bestofyahoo/
