On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 22:44 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > Mark, > > I understand. But I would point out that we should not confuse the issue of > the board with providing feedback on the bylaws. Additional feedback on the > document itself would be appreciated.
Even more? Have you resolved all earlier reported issues already? :) Seriously, I was under the impression that the makeup of the newly proposed board was part of the bylaws. I have given feedback on the text of that, which I hope you will consider for revision. In particular, the bylaws currently suggest that the board should have three appointed members with a minority number of seats for independent candidates. I propose you change that to something more in line with the previous bylaws which at least made sure there was a majority of independent seats. And ideally it doesn't have any non-democratic seats. Thanks, Mark
