On 29 April 2011 18:26, Mario Torre <[email protected]> wrote: > Il giorno gio, 28/04/2011 alle 12.16 +0100, Simon Phipps ha scritto: >> On 28 Apr 2011, at 11:33, Andrew Haley wrote: >> >> > On 28/04/11 11:30, Mark Wielaard wrote: >> >> >> >> - Get rid of the SCA. Commit to using the GPL for everything. >> >> People should be able to be members of the community without >> >> having to assign all their rights on non-reciprocal terms to >> >> Oracle. >> > >> > I'd like to respond to that, but shouldn't we drop gb-discuss from >> > the groups list to do so? We're getting off-topic. >> >> Given we are discussing governance I suggest we drop discuss@ instead. My >> comments only appear there, for example. >> >> S. > > No please, this is an important topic, valid for discuss, not just > specific to gb (besides, I don't want to subscribe to the new mailing > list in the middle of a thread :). >
This is exactly why I CCed discuss@ in the first place instead of allowing this to be hidden away on a minority list. IMHO, the two lists should be merged. gb-discuss is not sufficiently high traffic to warrant a separate list from discuss. - Andrew :-) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and IcedTea http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://icedtea.classpath.org PGP Key: F5862A37 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EA30 D855 D50F 90CD F54D 0698 0713 C3ED F586 2A37
