On 5 May 2011 22:16, <[email protected]> wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- > >> From: Mario Torre <[email protected]> >> To: Simon Phipps <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Sent: Fri, April 29, 2011 1:26:36 PM >> Subject: Re: OpenJDK Governing Board Minutes: 20011/4/21 >> >> > Given we are discussing governance I suggest we drop discuss@ instead. My >>comments only appear there, for example. >> > >> > S. >> >> No please, this is an important topic, valid for discuss, not just >> specific to gb (besides, I don't want to subscribe to the new mailing >> list in the middle of a thread :). > > I think a whole new list for a governance board is silly anyways. Too many > mailing list are just an annoyance. The governance board of NetBeans uses the > nbdiscuss list which is the NetBeans Discuss list and that works out well. No > separate list needed. Then everything discussing the project is done in one > simple place. > > Nothing the governance board is going to discuss is not going to be about > discussing the project. Thus, I don't understand the need for such a list. > Again, just annoying. > > Wade > > ================== > Wade Chandler > Software Engineer and Developer > NetBeans Dream Team Member and Contributor > > http://wiki.netbeans.org/wiki/view/NetBeansDreamTeam > http://www.netbeans.org > >
I completely agree. There are way too many lists and the only benefit of this list is it allows Oracle to hide material they don't want everyone to see. -- Andrew :-) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and IcedTea http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://icedtea.classpath.org PGP Key: F5862A37 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EA30 D855 D50F 90CD F54D 0698 0713 C3ED F586 2A37
