------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29
15:32 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > I am also refereing to this example:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-01/msg00300.html
>
> Now there is a libstdc++ bug for not using pop/push of the visibility in the
> headers which is not what
> I orginally thought this bug was about.
If you actually commented saying that this came from libstdc++ and then I would
have commented
saying that there needs some push/pop in the headers but instead you gave a
simplified example which
is not a gcc/linker bug but a programmers mistake.
Confirmed, changing the summary to match the correct the sumbitter's mistake of
not giving the full
story.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|target |libstdc++
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-01-29 15:32:29
date| |
Summary|-fvisibility-inlines-hidden |libstdc++ headers should
|fails with gcc's extern |have pop/push of the
|template extension on amd64 |visibility around the
| |declarations
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664
